Monday 27 July 2009

Paedomorphosis and anthropomorphism

Pedomorphologic characteristics in product design, at a first reading refer to anthropomorphic characteristics. The examples of anthropomorphic artifacts are extended and there is a long-held propensity for this kind of forms that can be dated back to earliest times.But there is a fine distinction between the two attributes. Or maybe paedomorphosis (always in design) is a special case of anthropomorphism. Toys for example or even character design, under which label can be placed? A table with the two separated phenomena must be made.

Description

In my master thesis I intent to explore the type of product design, which appear to exhibits the features of paedomorphosis.

Pedomorphosis (also spelled paedomorphosis) or juvenification is a term in evolutionary biology referring to the retention, by adults in a species, of traits previously seen only in juveniles.

In terms of design, in the postwar years, had been noticed a tendency to develop forms with childlike characteristics or proportions. For example Baby Austins A35 (1956), Mini Morris (1959) and projects like Michele De Lucchi household prototypes for Gimli.

Biology theories suggest that humans' neotenous characteristics were an evolutionary strategy that enabled Homo sapiens to gain predominance over H. neanderthalensis by appealing to these species' nurturing instincts through paedomorphic cuteness to avoid territorial aggression. Paedomorphical characteristics in women are widely acknowledged as desirable by men. For instance, vellus hair, small head, curved forehead etc. These characteristics are the elements of attractiveness, which has been analyzed by anthropology, psychology, sociology and sexology.

I have formulated my working hypothesis in this way:

It seems that a category of products in the postwar product development is characterizing by a formal vocabulary that exhibits characteristics of what evolutionary biology defines as paedomorphosis.

These products, through the years, have become popular and attractive. Some of the questions I would like to answer in this thesis are: Is this attraction related to the childlike proportions and farther on to paedomorphosis? Is it a constant human response or simple a trend and fashion which is a consequence of higher standards of living nowadays? Is that phenomenon, in terms of causes and reasons, takes part in the postwar era or is it a long-standing one? I will try, also, to understand why and how this phenomenon has been generated and what factors have support it – maybe, here the terms of emotional design and psychology can be used.

I will try to develop a list of elements that constitute the paedomorphical expression both in humans and animals; and I will try to find out how such features have been applied to artifacts in the past and how such a formal vocabulary can be used by product designers in the future.

Tuesday 21 July 2009

Blog as a daily diary for a research project on design history.

This blog is aimed to be my daily diary for my theoritical Master diploma at School of Architecture and Design in Oslo. The theme is :
Paedomorphosis in Design. A 20th century phenomenon and if so why?
and is planned to start official at the 3d of August 2009 and go on until the 10th of December 2009.
Main supervisor is Jan Michl , professor at AHO.